Economic Modeling Comments PDF Print

The following organizations and individuals submitted written comments on WCI's Economic Modeling work: 

(Organizationshave submitted comments at various times throughout the development ofWCI's economic modeling. For comments submitted outside theinitial request for comments in July/August, 2008, and in caseswhere the same organization has submitted mulitple comments, the datesare noted.)

Environmental Defense Fund (inconjunction with Natural Resouces Defense Council, NorthwestEnergy Coalition, Sightline Institute, Union of Concerned Scientists,Utah Clean Energy and Wester Resource Advocates.)
     - Environmental Defense Fund supporting documents
Independent Energy Producers Association (IEPA)  
      Joint Utility Letter Commenting on WCI Modeling Assumptions Book     
      Submitted by:
      - PacifiCorp 
      - Portland General Electric
      - Puget Sound Energy
NM Conference of Churches
PacifiCorp
Public Utility District No.1 of Chelan County (WA)
Puget Sound Energy (includes comments on Allocations, Electricity and Scope) 
Rio Tinto Services, Inc.

Salt River Project (May 13, 2008)
   Salt River Project (August 13, 2008)
Sempra Energy (Nov. 28, 2008 -- in preparation for Dec. 3 Statekholder call)
Sighline Institute (Dec. 4, 2008 - following Dec. 3 Stakeholder call)
Sightline Institute (April 29, 2008)
Sightline Institute (May 13, 2008)
Puget Sound Energy (includes comments on Allocations, Scope and Electricity)

Tucson Electric Power
Van Horn Company (Dec. 16, 2008)
Western Climate Advocates Network
West Associates (Jan. 30, 2009)
West Associates (Nov. 2008 -- in preparation for Dec. 3 Statekholder call)
West Associates (May 20, 2008)
West Associates (August 25, 2008)
Western States Petroleum Association (Nov. 2008 -- (Nov. 2008 -- in preparation for Dec. 3 Statekholder call)
Western States Petroleum Association